Comments on: Can I use fire?

By: paili-chan

paili-chan — Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:39:20 +0000

Dang just how long has Anlise been under the influence of the vines and flowers if she thinks the LAST Dorothy has only JUST died? *lol*

By: Sienna Maiu

Sienna Maiu — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:57:54 +0000

Considering that she supposedly had no way to burn the poppy field on the yellow brick road, I really don’t get how this has become her new favourite threat. :\

By: Sienna Maiu

Sienna Maiu — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:56:28 +0000

Technically, a year after could still be considered “just”, especially when considering that the girl in front of you is in her twenties.

By: Isa

Isa — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 03:20:36 +0000

Agreed.

By: Rina

Rina — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:05:51 +0000

Well, you refer to shoes as a plural (“My shoes are red”), but the shoes together make up Hercilia, so the plural shoes are a singular pyromaniac. /probablyfaultyreasoning

By: FrankNW

FrankNW — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:07:54 +0000

I beg to differ. “My shoes are…” is the proper way to start, and then, to complete the equation, “a pyromaniac” fits nicely. It’s very apparent to me that Rina had it right. (Of course, I found this a little belatedly.)

By: Lien Rag

Lien Rag — Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:51:13 +0000

Or was there an older spell before Renge’s poppies?
I think Renge took power after the disparition of Ozma, and the last Dorothy’s death was before Ozma’s disappearance.
Or the memory loss cleans parts of her memories beyond the duration of the spell?

By: Asj

Asj — Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:25:57 +0000

Hercilia’s her answer for everything. :/

By: Asj

Asj — Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:24:31 +0000

I think the correct wording would be “my shoes is a pyromaniac” because the shoes is one.
(seems like I run into a lot of odd grammar when I write stuff… I think it usually depends on the way it’s meant, not the way it’s written)

By: Sydney

Sydney — Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:00:44 +0000

KILL IT WITH FIRE!