Comments on: Where is “it”?

By: Lien Rag

Lien Rag — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:41:04 +0000

La lisibilité de la troisième case est assez limitée…
Le découpage de l’action est plutôt bien fait mais cette défaillance de la troisième case détruit partiellement l’effet, c’est dommage.

By: Gene Wirchenko

Gene Wirchenko — Fri, 08 Jun 2012 01:09:57 +0000

I was referring to additional action by me, but if Jinjur’s forces wish to do me a service, I will graciously accept.

By: Azurite

Azurite — Thu, 07 Jun 2012 06:15:28 +0000

Also, the ruby slippers were a convention of the movie, not the Oz books, upon which Namesake draws its canon. However, I do remember when Emma first visited the house of the Dorothies, there was a pair of red shoes laid out.

Nonetheless, since the original shoes/slippers (regardless of color) were supposed to be pretty darn powerful, I’m not so sure if they would just be left in the House, even if no one but the Dorothies is supposed to be able to go inside. Also, they were from Oz, not from Kansas/our world, so they wouldn’t have been left as an offering the way the other items were.

By: Sam

Sam — Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:07:58 +0000

Actually it would be Glinda/Sabion’s Guards.

See the spears and white gowns, not the knitting-needles?

By: Minnion

Minnion — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 03:09:58 +0000

Well that doesn’t rule out the other face things actually being the Dorthies, even if the actual phantom is some monster that is made up of the faces of it’s victims… (As in Xpacetrue could be right about the faces being previous victims of the phantom thing, and the phantom itself being made of it’s previous victims who were all Dorathies as they were the only ones in Oz who were not protected by the magic that created Oz… Emma luckuly might be under some other protection and the phantom is trying to break it…)

By: ChattaStarhawk

ChattaStarhawk — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:12:14 +0000

Is the “it” Emma? Or is she referring to what’s in Emma? Hmmm…

By: ChattaStarhawk

ChattaStarhawk — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:09:16 +0000

Emma knows the movie, she doesn’t know the original books; which means that she has a general knowledge of Oz and very little of the details from the novels.

By: snapdragon76

snapdragon76 — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:53:35 +0000

LOL at Warrick’s expression in the center panel. Like, “Dude!”

And I’m not sure I like Renge calling Emma an “it” like she was a non-entity. But, we don’t know for certain where her enmity stems from.

By: ravenyuuki87

ravenyuuki87 — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:14:58 +0000

im starting to feel sorry for him they keep makeing him do all this stuff and bossing him around and those ladys there real bitch’s i hate them but i like this story sofar!

By: Golemgear

Golemgear — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:20:12 +0000

I love the fact, that on her back and surrounded by enemy weapons, Renge is still ready to swing bolo punches.